What Three Important Concepts Form the Basis of Modern Ethics Review?

Systematic written report undertaken to increase knowledge

"Researched" redirects here. For the organisation, run into ResearchED.

Basrelief sculpture "Research holding the torch of cognition" (1896) by Olin Levi Warner. Library of Congress, Thomas Jefferson Building, in Washington, D.C.

Enquiry is "artistic and systematic work undertaken to increase the stock of knowledge".^[i] Information technology involves the collection, organization and assay of information to increment understanding of a topic or issue. A research project may be an expansion on past work in the field. To test the validity of instruments, procedures, or experiments, inquiry may replicate elements of prior projects or the projection as a whole.

The master purposes of basic research (as opposed to applied research) are documentation, discovery, interpretation, and the research and evolution (R&D) of methods and systems for the advocacy of human knowledge. Approaches to enquiry depend on epistemologies, which vary considerably both within and between humanities and sciences. There are several forms of enquiry: scientific, humanities, artistic, economic, social, business, marketing, practitioner research, life, technological, etc. The scientific study of enquiry practices is known every bit meta-research.

Etymology [edit]

The word research is derived from the Middle French "recherche", which means "to go about seeking", the term itself beingness derived from the Old French term "recerchier" a chemical compound discussion from "re-" + "cerchier", or "sercher", significant 'search'.^[3] The earliest recorded use of the term was in 1577.^[3]

Definitions [edit]

Research has been divers in a number of different means, and while there are similarities, there does not appear to be a unmarried, all-encompassing definition that is embraced by all who appoint in it.

One definition of research is used past the OECD, "Whatsoever creative systematic activity undertaken in order to increase the stock of knowledge, including knowledge of man, civilization and society, and the use of this knowledge to devise new applications."^[iv]

Another definition of research is given by John Due west. Creswell, who states that "enquiry is a process of steps used to collect and analyze data to increase our understanding of a topic or issue". It consists of three steps: pose a question, collect data to answer the question, and nowadays an respond to the question.^[5]

The Merriam-Webster Online Lexicon defines enquiry in more detail as "studious inquiry or examination; especially : investigation or experimentation aimed at the discovery and interpretation of facts, revision of accepted theories or laws in the light of new facts, or applied application of such new or revised theories or laws"^[three]

Forms of research [edit]

"Original research" redirects here. For the Wikipedia prohibition against user-generated, unpublished inquiry, encounter Wikipedia:No original research.

Original research [edit]

Original research, too called primary research, is inquiry that is not exclusively based on a summary, review, or synthesis of earlier publications on the subject area of research. This material is of a primary-source character. The purpose of the original inquiry is to produce new knowledge, rather than to nowadays the existing knowledge in a new form (e.g., summarized or classified).^{[6] [7]} Original research can be in various forms, depending on the discipline information technology pertains to. In experimental work, it typically involves direct or indirect observation of the researched subject(s), e.grand., in the laboratory or in the field, documents the methodology, results, and conclusions of an experiment or set of experiments, or offers a novel interpretation of previous results. In analytical work, there are typically some new (for instance) mathematical results produced, or a new way of budgeted an existing problem. In some subjects which do not typically carry out experimentation or analysis of this kind, the originality is in the particular way existing agreement is changed or re-interpreted based on the outcome of the work of the researcher.^[eight]

The caste of originality of the research is among major criteria for articles to be published in academic journals and usually established by ways of peer review.^[9] Graduate students are commonly required to perform original research equally part of a dissertation.^[10]

Scientific inquiry [edit]

Scientific research equipment at MIT

Scientific research is a systematic way of gathering information and harnessing curiosity. This research provides scientific information and theories for the explanation of the nature and the backdrop of the globe. It makes practical applications possible. Scientific enquiry is funded past public authorities, past charitable organizations and by individual groups, including many companies. Scientific research can be subdivided into different classifications according to their academic and application disciplines. Scientific research is a widely used criterion for judging the standing of an academic institution, only some debate that such is an inaccurate cess of the establishment, because the quality of inquiry does not tell nigh the quality of teaching (these exercise not necessarily correlate).^[eleven]

Generally, research is understood to follow a certain structural process. Though stride order may vary depending on the subject field affair and researcher, the following steps are usually part of most formal inquiry, both bones and practical:

1. Observations and formation of the topic: Consists of the subject area of one's interest and post-obit that field of study surface area to conduct bailiwick-related research. The subject should not be randomly called since it requires reading a vast amount of literature on the topic to decide the gap in the literature the researcher intends to narrow. A cracking interest in the chosen subject field is advisable. The research will have to be justified by linking its importance to already existing knowledge most the topic.
2. Hypothesis: A testable prediction which designates the human relationship between two or more variables.
3. Conceptual definition: Description of a concept by relating it to other concepts.
4. Operational definition: Details in regards to defining the variables and how they will be measured/assessed in the written report.
5. Gathering of data: Consists of identifying a population and selecting samples, gathering information from or about these samples by using specific research instruments. The instruments used for data drove must be valid and reliable.
6. Analysis of information: Involves breaking down the individual pieces of data to draw conclusions near it.
7. Information Estimation: This can exist represented through tables, figures, and pictures, and and so described in words.
8. Test, revising of hypothesis
9. Conclusion, reiteration if necessary

A common misconception is that a hypothesis will be proven (see, rather, aught hypothesis). Generally, a hypothesis is used to make predictions that can be tested by observing the outcome of an experiment. If the outcome is inconsistent with the hypothesis, then the hypothesis is rejected (encounter falsifiability). Even so, if the consequence is consistent with the hypothesis, the experiment is said to support the hypothesis. This careful language is used because researchers recognize that alternative hypotheses may besides be consistent with the observations. In this sense, a hypothesis tin never be proven, merely rather only supported by surviving rounds of scientific testing and, eventually, becoming widely thought of as true.

A useful hypothesis allows prediction and within the accurateness of observation of the fourth dimension, the prediction will be verified. As the accuracy of ascertainment improves with time, the hypothesis may no longer provide an accurate prediction. In this case, a new hypothesis will arise to claiming the old, and to the extent that the new hypothesis makes more authentic predictions than the old, the new will supplant information technology. Researchers can as well employ a null hypothesis, which states no relationship or divergence between the independent or dependent variables.

Research in the humanities [edit]

Research in the humanities involves different methods such as for example hermeneutics and semiotics. Humanities scholars usually do not search for the ultimate correct reply to a question, simply instead, explore the problems and details that surround it. Context is always of import, and context can be social, historical, political, cultural, or ethnic. An example of research in the humanities is historical inquiry, which is embodied in historical method. Historians use master sources and other prove to systematically investigate a topic, and and so to write histories in the class of accounts of the past. Other studies aim to simply examine the occurrence of behaviours in societies and communities, without particularly looking for reasons or motivations to explicate these. These studies may be qualitative or quantitative, and can use a variety of approaches, such as queer theory or feminist theory.^[12]

Artistic inquiry [edit]

Artistic research, also seen every bit 'practice-based research', can take form when creative works are considered both the research and the object of inquiry itself. It is the debatable body of thought which offers an culling to purely scientific methods in research in its search for knowledge and truth.

The controversial trend of artistic instruction becoming more academics-oriented is leading to artistic research beingness accepted as the primary mode of enquiry in fine art as in the instance of other disciplines.^[13] One of the characteristics of artistic research is that it must take subjectivity as opposed to the classical scientific methods. Every bit such, it is similar to the social sciences in using qualitative enquiry and intersubjectivity equally tools to apply measurement and critical assay.^[14]

Artistic research has been defined by the Schoolhouse of Dance and Circus (Dans och Cirkushögskolan, DOCH), Stockholm in the following manner – "Creative inquiry is to investigate and test with the purpose of gaining knowledge inside and for our creative disciplines. It is based on artistic practices, methods, and criticality. Through presented documentation, the insights gained shall be placed in a context."^[15] Artistic research aims to enhance cognition and understanding with presentation of the arts.^[sixteen] A simpler understanding by Julian Klein defines artistic inquiry as any kind of research employing the creative fashion of perception.^[17] For a survey of the cardinal problematics of today'due south artistic enquiry, run into Giaco Schiesser.^[eighteen]

According to artist Hakan Topal, in artistic research, "peradventure more and then than other disciplines, intuition is utilized as a method to identify a wide range of new and unexpected productive modalities".^[19] Most writers, whether of fiction or non-fiction books, also have to do research to support their artistic work. This may exist factual, historical, or background inquiry. Groundwork inquiry could include, for instance, geographical or procedural research.^[20]

The Lodge for Artistic Research (SAR) publishes the triannual Journal for Artistic Research (JAR),^{[21] [22]} an international, online, open access, and peer-reviewed journal for the identification, publication, and dissemination of artistic research and its methodologies, from all arts disciplines and it runs the Research Catalogue (RC),^{[23] [24] [25]} a searchable, documentary database of creative enquiry, to which anyone can contribute.

Patricia Leavy addresses viii arts-based inquiry (ABR) genres: narrative inquiry, fiction-based research, poetry, music, dance, theatre, film, and visual art.^[26]

In 2016, the European League of Institutes of the Arts launched The Florence Principles' on the Doctorate in the Arts.^[27] The Florence Principles relating to the Salzburg Principles and the Salzburg Recommendations of the European Academy Association name 7 points of attending to specify the Doctorate / PhD in the Arts compared to a scientific doctorate / PhD. The Florence Principles have been endorsed and are supported also past AEC, CILECT, CUMULUS and SAR.

Historical research [edit]

German historian Leopold von Ranke (1795–1886), considered to exist ane of the founders of mod source-based history

The historical method comprises the techniques and guidelines past which historians use historical sources and other bear witness to research and and so to write history. There are diverse history guidelines that are commonly used past historians in their work, under the headings of external criticism, internal criticism, and synthesis. This includes lower criticism and sensual criticism. Though items may vary depending on the discipline thing and researcher, the following concepts are office of most formal historical enquiry:^[28]

• Identification of origin date
• Testify of localization
• Recognition of authorship
• Analysis of data
• Identification of integrity
• Attribution of credibility

Documentary research [edit]

Steps in conducting research [edit]

Research design and show

Inquiry is often conducted using the hourglass model structure of research.^[29] The hourglass model starts with a broad spectrum for research, focusing in on the required information through the method of the projection (like the neck of the hourglass), then expands the enquiry in the form of discussion and results. The major steps in conducting enquiry are:^[30]

• Identification of research problem
• Literature review
• Specifying the purpose of enquiry
• Determining specific inquiry questions
• Specification of a conceptual framework, sometimes including a set of hypotheses^[31]
• Option of a methodology (for data collection)
• Information collection
• Verifying data
• Analyzing and interpreting the information
• Reporting and evaluating research
• Communicating the research findings and, possibly, recommendations

The steps generally represent the overall process; notwithstanding, they should be viewed equally an ever-changing iterative process rather than a stock-still set of steps.^[32] Most research begins with a general argument of the problem, or rather, the purpose for engaging in the study.^[33] The literature review identifies flaws or holes in previous research which provides justification for the study. Often, a literature review is conducted in a given subject expanse earlier a enquiry question is identified. A gap in the electric current literature, equally identified by a researcher, then engenders a inquiry question. The research question may be parallel to the hypothesis. The hypothesis is the supposition to exist tested. The researcher(due south) collects data to test the hypothesis. The researcher(s) then analyzes and interprets the data via a diverseness of statistical methods, engaging in what is known as empirical research. The results of the data analysis in rejecting or declining to pass up the nada hypothesis are and so reported and evaluated. At the finish, the researcher may hash out avenues for further inquiry. However, some researchers advocate for the reverse approach: starting with articulating findings and discussion of them, moving "upwards" to identification of a enquiry problem that emerges in the findings and literature review. The reverse arroyo is justified by the transactional nature of the research endeavor where research inquiry, inquiry questions, research method, relevant research literature, then on are non fully known until the findings accept fully emerged and been interpreted.

Rudolph Rummel says, "... no researcher should have whatever i or two tests as definitive. Information technology is only when a range of tests are consistent over many kinds of information, researchers, and methods can one take conviction in the results."^[34]

Plato in Meno talks about an inherent difficulty, if not a paradox, of doing research that can be paraphrased in the following way, "If you know what you're searching for, why do you search for information technology?! [i.east., yous have already found it] If you lot don't know what you're searching for, what are you searching for?!"^[35]

Research methods [edit]

The research room at the New York Public Library, an example of secondary research in progress

The goal of the enquiry procedure is to produce new noesis or deepen agreement of a topic or issue. This process takes three chief forms (although, equally previously discussed, the boundaries between them may exist obscure):

• Exploratory research, which helps to identify and define a problem or question.
• Constructive enquiry, which tests theories and proposes solutions to a problem or question.
• Empirical research, which tests the feasibility of a solution using empirical bear witness.

In that location are two major types of empirical research pattern: qualitative research and quantitative research. Researchers cull qualitative or quantitative methods according to the nature of the research topic they want to investigate and the research questions they aim to answer:

Qualitative research

This involves understanding man behavior and the reasons that govern such behavior, by asking a broad question, collecting data in the form of words, images, video etc. that is analyzed, and searching for themes. This type of inquiry aims to investigate a question without attempting to quantifiably measure variables or look to potential relationships between variables. Information technology is viewed every bit more restrictive in testing hypotheses because it can be expensive and time-consuming and typically limited to a single set of research subjects.^{[ commendation needed ]} Qualitative research is ofttimes used as a method of exploratory research as a ground for later on quantitative research hypotheses.^{[ citation needed ]} Qualitative research is linked with the philosophical and theoretical stance of social constructionism.

Social media posts are used for qualitative inquiry.^[37]

Quantitative research

This involves systematic empirical investigation of quantitative properties and phenomena and their relationships, by asking a narrow question and collecting numerical information to analyze it utilizing statistical methods. The quantitative enquiry designs are experimental, correlational, and survey (or descriptive).^[38] Statistics derived from quantitative research can be used to establish the being of associative or causal relationships between variables. Quantitative inquiry is linked with the philosophical and theoretical stance of positivism.

The quantitative data collection methods rely on random sampling and structured data collection instruments that fit various experiences into predetermined response categories.^{[ citation needed ]} These methods produce results that can exist summarized, compared, and generalized to larger populations if the information are nerveless using proper sampling and information collection strategies.^[39] Quantitative research is concerned with testing hypotheses derived from theory or being able to estimate the size of a phenomenon of interest.^[39]

If the research question is almost people, participants may be randomly assigned to unlike treatments (this is the simply way that a quantitative study can be considered a true experiment).^{[ citation needed ]} If this is non feasible, the researcher may collect data on participant and situational characteristics to statistically command for their influence on the dependent, or outcome, variable. If the intent is to generalize from the inquiry participants to a larger population, the researcher will employ probability sampling to select participants.^[40]

In either qualitative or quantitative research, the researcher(s) may collect principal or secondary data.^[39] Master data is data collected specifically for the research, such every bit through interviews or questionnaires. Secondary data is data that already exists, such as census information, which can be re-used for the enquiry. Information technology is practiced ethical enquiry do to utilize secondary data wherever possible.^[41]

Mixed-method research, i.east. enquiry that includes qualitative and quantitative elements, using both main and secondary information, is becoming more mutual.^[42] This method has benefits that using i method alone cannot offering. For instance, a researcher may cull to carry a qualitative study and follow information technology up with a quantitative study to gain additional insights.^[43]

Big data has brought large impacts on research methods so that now many researchers practice non put much try into data collection; furthermore, methods to clarify easily available huge amounts of information have besides been developed. Types of Research Method 1. Observatory Research Method 2. Correlation Enquiry Method ^[44]

Non-empirical research

Non-empirical (theoretical) enquiry is an arroyo that involves the development of theory every bit opposed to using observation and experimentation. Equally such, non-empirical inquiry seeks solutions to problems using existing knowledge as its source. This, nonetheless, does non mean that new ideas and innovations cannot exist found inside the pool of existing and established knowledge. Non-empirical research is non an absolute alternative to empirical research because they may be used together to strengthen a enquiry approach. Neither ane is less effective than the other since they accept their particular purpose in science. Typically empirical research produces observations that need to be explained; and so theoretical enquiry tries to explicate them, and in so doing generates empirically testable hypotheses; these hypotheses are then tested empirically, giving more observations that may need further explanation; so on. Come across Scientific method.

A simple instance of a non-empirical task is the prototyping of a new drug using a differentiated application of existing knowledge; another is the development of a business process in the form of a flow chart and texts where all the ingredients are from established knowledge. Much of cosmological inquiry is theoretical in nature. Mathematics inquiry does not rely on externally bachelor data; rather, it seeks to prove theorems about mathematical objects.

Research ethics [edit]

Research ethics is concerned with the moral problems that arise during or equally a result of research activities, besides as the conduct of private researchers, and the implications for enquiry communities.^[45] Historically, scandals such as Nazi human experimentation and the Tuskegee syphilis experiment led to the realisation that clear measures are needed for the ethical governance of research to ensure that people, animals and environments are not unduly harmed by scientific inquiry. The management of research ideals is inconsistent beyond countries and there is no universally accepted approach to how it should be addressed.^{[46] [47] [48]} Enquiry ethics committees take emerged as ane governance mechanism to ensure inquiry is conducted responsibly.

When making moral judgements, we may be guided by different values. Philosophers commonly distinguish between approaches similar deontology, consequentialism, Confucianism, virtue ethics, and Ubuntu ethics, to list a few. Regardless of approach, the application of ethical theory to specific contexts is known as applied ethics, and enquiry ethics can be viewed equally a subfield of applied ideals because ethical theory is applied in real-world research scenarios.

Upstanding bug may arise in the design and implementation of research involving human experimentation or animal experimentation. There may besides be consequences for the surroundings, for social club or for future generations that demand to be considered. Research ethics is most developed as a concept in medical research, with typically cited codes existence the 1947 Nuremberg Code, the 1964 Announcement of Helsinki, and the 1978 Belmont Study. Informed consent is a key concept in research ethics thanks to these codes. Inquiry in other fields such every bit social sciences, information technology, biotechnology, or engineering may generate different types of ethical concerns to those in medical research.^{[46] [47] [49] [50] [51] [52]}

In countries such as Canada, mandatory research ideals training is required for students, professors and others who work in research,^{[53] [54]} whilst the U.s. has legislated on how institutional review boards operate since the 1974 National Inquiry Act.

Present, research ethics is commonly distinguished from matters of enquiry integrity that includes issues such every bit scientific misconduct (e.g. fraud, fabrication of data or plagiarism).

Problems in research [edit]

Meta-research [edit]

Meta-inquiry is the study of research through the use of research methods. Also known as "research on enquiry", information technology aims to reduce waste and increase the quality of research in all fields. Meta-enquiry concerns itself with the detection of bias, methodological flaws, and other errors and inefficiencies. Amidst the finding of meta-inquiry is a low rates of reproducibility across a big number of fields. This widespread difficulty in reproducing research has been termed the "replication crisis."^[55]

Methods of research [edit]

In many disciplines, Western methods of conducting research are predominant.^[56] Researchers are overwhelmingly taught Western methods of data collection and study. The increasing participation of indigenous peoples as researchers has brought increased attention to the scientific lacuna in culturally-sensitive methods of information collection.^[57] Western methods of data collection may not exist the nearly accurate or relevant for research on non-Western societies. For example, "Hua Oranga" was created as a benchmark for psychological evaluation in Māori populations, and is based on dimensions of mental health of import to the Māori people – "taha wairua (the spiritual dimension), taha hinengaro (the mental dimension), taha tinana (the physical dimension), and taha whanau (the family dimension)".^[58]

Bias [edit]

Research is oft biased in the languages that are preferred (linguicism) and the geographic locations where research occurs. Periphery scholars confront the challenges of exclusion and linguicism in research and academic publication. Every bit the great majority of mainstream academic journals are written in English language, multilingual periphery scholars oft must translate their work to be accustomed to elite Western-dominated journals.^[59] Multilingual scholars' influences from their native communicative styles can be assumed to be incompetence instead of difference.^[lx]

For comparative politics, Western countries are over-represented in single-country studies, with heavy emphasis on Western Europe, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. Since 2000, Latin American countries have become more than pop in single-state studies. In contrast, countries in Oceania and the Caribbean are the focus of very few studies. Patterns of geographic bias also show a relationship with linguicism: countries whose official languages are French or Arabic are far less likely to be the focus of unmarried-country studies than countries with different official languages. Within Africa, English language-speaking countries are more than represented than other countries.^[61]

Generalizability [edit]

Generalization is the process of more broadly applying the valid results of one study.^[62] Studies with a narrow telescopic can outcome in a lack of generalizability, meaning that the results may not exist applicable to other populations or regions. In comparative politics, this can result from using a unmarried-land written report, rather than a study pattern that uses data from multiple countries. Despite the issue of generalizability, single-country studies accept risen in prevalence since the late 2000s.^[61]

Publication peer review [edit]

This commodity needs to be updated. The reason given is: This subsection's claims are potentially outdated in the "digital age" given that about-total penetration of Spider web admission amid scholars worldwide enables any scholar[s] to submit papers to whatever periodical anywhere. Please help update this commodity to reflect recent events or newly available information. (May 2017)

Peer review is a form of cocky-regulation by qualified members of a profession within the relevant field. Peer review methods are employed to maintain standards of quality, ameliorate performance, and provide credibility. In academia, scholarly peer review is often used to determine an academic paper's suitability for publication. Usually, the peer review process involves experts in the same field who are consulted by editors to give a review of the scholarly works produced by a colleague of theirs from an unbiased and impartial point of view, and this is commonly done free of charge. The tradition of peer reviews being done for complimentary has however brought many pitfalls which are likewise indicative of why virtually peer reviewers turn down many invitations to review.^[63] It was observed that publications from periphery countries rarely rise to the same aristocracy condition every bit those of Due north America and Europe, because limitations on the availability of resources including loftier-quality paper and sophisticated image-rendering software and printing tools render these publications less able to satisfy standards currently carrying formal or informal authority in the publishing manufacture.^[threescore] These limitations in turn outcome in the nether-representation of scholars from periphery nations among the set of publications holding prestige status relative to the quantity and quality of those scholars' inquiry efforts, and this under-representation in plow results in unduly reduced acceptance of the results of their efforts as contributions to the torso of knowledge bachelor worldwide.

Influence of the open-access movement [edit]

The open admission movement assumes that all information more often than not deemed useful should be complimentary and belongs to a "public domain", that of "humanity".^[64] This idea gained prevalence as a result of Western colonial history and ignores alternative conceptions of knowledge circulation. For instance, almost ethnic communities consider that access to certain information proper to the grouping should be determined by relationships.^[64]

There is alleged to exist a double standard in the Western knowledge system. On the one hand, "digital right management" used to restrict admission to personal data on social networking platforms is celebrated as a protection of privacy, while simultaneously when similar functions are used past cultural groups (i.east. indigenous communities) this is denounced as "access command" and reprehended as censorship.^[64]

Future perspectives [edit]

Fifty-fifty though Western authority seems to be prominent in research, some scholars, such as Simon Marginson, argue for "the need [for] a plural university globe".^[65] Marginson argues that the Eastward Asian Confucian model could take over the Western model.

This could be due to changes in funding for enquiry both in the East and the West. Focused on emphasizing educational achievement, Eastward Asian cultures, mainly in Communist china and Republic of korea, have encouraged the increase of funding for research expansion.^[65] In contrast, in the Western academic world, notably in the U.k. as well every bit in some state governments in the United States, funding cuts for university research have occurred, which some^{[ who? ]} say may lead to the future refuse of Western dominance in research.

Neo-colonial approaches [edit]

Neo-colonial inquiry or neo-colonial science,^{[66] [67]} frequently described as helicopter research,^[66] parachute science^{[68] [69]} or research,^[70] parasitic research,^{[71] [72]} or safari study,^[73] is when researchers from wealthier countries go to a developing country, collect information, travel back to their country, analyze the data and samples, and publish the results with no or little involvement of local researchers. A 2003 study by the Hungarian university of sciences found that seventy% of articles in a random sample of publications about least-adult countries did not include a local inquiry co-writer.^[67]

Frequently, during this kind of enquiry, the local colleagues might exist used to provide logistics simply are not engaged for their expertise or given credit for their participation in the research. Scientific publications resulting from parachute science frequently only contribute to the career of the scientists from rich countries, thus limiting the evolution of local science capacity (such as funded research centers) and the careers of local scientists.^[66] This form of "colonial" scientific discipline has reverberations of 19th century scientific practices of treating non-Western participants as "others" in order to accelerate colonialism—and critics call for the terminate of these extractivist practices in order to decolonize knowledge.^{[74] [75]}

This kind of research approach reduces the quality of research because international researchers may non ask the correct questions or draw connections to local bug.^[76] The consequence of this approach is that local communities are unable to leverage the research to their ain advantage.^[69] Ultimately, peculiarly for fields dealing with global issues like conservation biology which rely on local communities to implement solutions, neo-colonial science prevents institutionalization of the findings in local communities in order to address issues being studied by scientists.^{[69] [74]}

Professionalisation [edit]

In several national and private academic systems, the professionalisation of research has resulted in formal job titles.

In Russia [edit]

In present-day Russian federation, the old Soviet Union and in some post-Soviet states the term researcher (Russian: Научный сотрудник, nauchny sotrudnik) is both a generic term for a person who carried out scientific research, also as a job position within the frameworks of the USSR University of Sciences, Soviet universities, and in other enquiry-oriented establishments.

The following ranks are known:

• Junior Researcher (Inferior Research Acquaintance)
• Researcher (Research Acquaintance)
• Senior Researcher (Senior Research Associate)
• Leading Researcher (Leading Research Associate)^[77]
• Chief Researcher (Chief Research Acquaintance)

Publishing [edit]

Encompass of the first effect of Nature, 4 November 1869

Academic publishing is a arrangement that is necessary for academic scholars to peer review the work and brand information technology available for a wider audience. The system varies widely past field and is also e'er changing, if ofttimes slowly. Virtually bookish piece of work is published in journal article or book form. In that location is also a big trunk of enquiry that exists in either a thesis or dissertation form. These forms of inquiry tin can exist establish in databases explicitly for theses and dissertations. In publishing, STM publishing is an abbreviation for academic publications in science, technology, and medicine. Well-nigh established academic fields have their own scientific journals and other outlets for publication, though many bookish journals are somewhat interdisciplinary, and publish work from several singled-out fields or subfields. The kinds of publications that are accepted as contributions of knowledge or inquiry vary greatly between fields, from the impress to the electronic format. A written report suggests that researchers should not requite great consideration to findings that are not replicated oftentimes.^[78] It has too been suggested that all published studies should be subjected to some mensurate for assessing the validity or reliability of its procedures to prevent the publication of unproven findings.^[79] Concern models are different in the electronic environment. Since well-nigh the early 1990s, licensing of electronic resources, particularly journals, has been very common. Soon, a major trend, particularly with respect to scholarly journals, is open access.^[eighty] There are two main forms of open up access: open admission publishing, in which the articles or the whole journal is freely bachelor from the time of publication, and self-archiving, where the author makes a copy of their ain work freely available on the web.

Research funding [edit]

This section needs expansion with: funding for research in the humanities and other areas. Presently, only scientific inquiry is addressed. You tin help past adding to information technology. (April 2019)

Most funding for scientific enquiry comes from three major sources: corporate research and development departments; private foundations, for example, the Neb and Melinda Gates Foundation; and government research councils such every bit the National Institutes of Health in the USA^[81] and the Medical Research Council in the UK. These are managed primarily through universities and in some cases through armed forces contractors. Many senior researchers (such as grouping leaders) spend a significant amount of their time applying for grants for research funds. These grants are necessary not only for researchers to acquit out their research only also as a source of merit. The Social Psychology Network provides a comprehensive listing of U.Due south. Government and private foundation funding sources.

Run across also [edit]

• Advert research
• European Charter for Researchers
• Funding bias
• Internet enquiry
• List of countries past inquiry and development spending
• List of words ending in ology
• Market place research
• Marketing inquiry
• Open research
• Operations research
• Participatory activity research
• Psychological research methods
• Research integrity
• Enquiry-intensive cluster
• Research proposal
• Research university
• Scholarly research
• Secondary enquiry
• Social research
• Society for Artistic Inquiry
• Timeline of the history of the scientific method
• Undergraduate inquiry

References [edit]

1. ^ OECD (2015). Frascati Manual. The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities. doi:x.1787/9789264239012-en. hdl:xx.500.12749/13290. ISBN978-9264238800.
2. ^ "The Origins of Scientific discipline Archived 3 March 2003 at the Wayback Machine". Scientific American Frontiers.
3. ^ ^{a b c} "Research". Merriam-Webster.com. Merriam-Webster, Inc. Retrieved 20 May 2018.
4. ^ "OECD Glossary of Statistical Terms – Research and development UNESCO Definition". stats.oecd.org. Archived from the original on nineteen February 2007. Retrieved 20 May 2018.
5. ^ Creswell, J.W. (2008). Educational Research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson.^{[ ISBN missing ] [ page needed ]}
6. ^ "What is Original Research? Original inquiry is considered a main source". Thomas G. Carpenter Library, University of Northward Florida. Archived from the original on ix July 2011. Retrieved 9 August 2014.
7. ^ Rozakis, Laurie (2007). Schaum's Quick Guide to Writing Great Research Papers. McGraw Colina Professional person. ISBN978-0071511223 – via Google Books.
8. ^ Singh, Michael; Li, Bingyi (6 October 2009). "Early career researcher originality: Engaging Richard Florida'south international competition for creative workers" (PDF). Center for Educational Research, University of Western Sydney. p. 2. Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 April 2011. Retrieved 12 January 2012.
9. ^ Callaham, Michael; Wears, Robert; Weber, Ellen L. (2002). "Journal Prestige, Publication Bias, and Other Characteristics Associated With Commendation of Published Studies in Peer-Reviewed Journals". JAMA. 287 (21): 2847–50. doi:10.1001/jama.287.21.2847. PMID 12038930.
10. ^ US Department of Labor (2006). Occupational Outlook Handbook, 2006–2007 edition. Mcgraw-colina. ISBN978-0071472883 – via Google Books.
11. ^ J. Scott Armstrong & Tad Sperry (1994). "Business School Prestige: Research versus Educational activity" (PDF). Energy & Environment. 18 (2): 13–43. Archived from the original (PDF) on 20 June 2010. Retrieved 8 December 2011.
12. ^ Roffee, James A; Waling, Andrea (18 August 2016). "Resolving ethical challenges when researching with minority and vulnerable populations: LGBTIQ victims of violence, harassment and bullying". Inquiry Ethics. 13 (i): iv–22. doi:10.1177/1747016116658693.
13. ^ Lesage, Dieter (Spring 2009). "Who'south Afraid of Artistic Research? On measuring artistic research output" (PDF). Art & Enquiry. 2 (2). ISSN 1752-6388. Retrieved 14 August 2011.
14. ^ Eisner, E. W. (1981). "On the Differences between Scientific and Creative Approaches to Qualitative Research". Educational Researcher. 10 (4): 5–9. doi:ten.2307/1175121. JSTOR 1175121.
15. ^ Unattributed. "Artistic enquiry at DOCH". Dans och Cirkushögskolan (website) . Retrieved 14 August 2011.
16. ^ Schwab, M. (2009). "Typhoon Proposal". Journal for Artistic Research. Bern University of the Arts.
17. ^ Julian Klein (2010). "What is artistic enquiry?".
18. ^ Schiesser, G. (2015). What is at pale – Qu'est ce que l'enjeu? Paradoxes – Problematics – Perspectives in Artistic Research Today, in: Arts, Research, Innovation and Society. Eds. Gerald Bast, Elias G. Carayannis [= ARIS, Vol. 1]. Wien/New York: Springer. pp. 197–210.
19. ^ Topal, H. (2014). "Whose Terms? A Glossary for Social Practice: Research". newmuseum.org. Archived from the original on 9 September 2014.
20. ^ Hoffman, A. (2003). Research for Writers, pp. 4–5. London: A&C Black Publishers Limited.
21. ^ "Swiss Science and Technology Research Quango (2011), Inquiry Funding in the Arts" (PDF).
22. ^ Henk Borgdorff (2012), The Disharmonize of the Faculties. Perspectives on Creative Research and Academia (Chapter 11: The Example of the Journal for Creative Inquiry), Leiden: Leiden University Printing.
23. ^ Schwab, Michael, and Borgdorff, Henk, eds. (2014), The Exposition of Artistic Research: Publishing Fine art in Academia, Leiden: Leiden University Press.
24. ^ Wilson, Nick and van Ruiten, Schelte / ELIA, eds. (2013), SHARE Handbook for Artistic Research Education, Amsterdam: Valand Academy, p. 249.
25. ^ Hughes, Rolf: "Leap into Another Kind: International Developments in Creative Research," in Swedish Research Council, ed. (2013), Artistic Inquiry Then and Now: 2004–2013, Yearbook of AR&D 2013, Stockholm: Swedish Research Council.
26. ^ Leavy, Patricia (2015). Methods Meets Art (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford. ISBN978-1462519446.
27. ^ "Florence principles, 2016" (PDF).
28. ^ Garraghan, Gilbert J. (1946). A Guide to Historical Method . New York: Fordham University Press. p. 168. ISBN978-0-8371-7132-6.
29. ^ Trochim, West.M.K, (2006). Research Methods Knowledge Base.
30. ^ Creswell, J.W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. 2008 ISBN 0-xiii-613550-1 (pages 8–nine)
31. ^ Shields, Patricia M.; Rangarjan, North. (2013). A Playbook for Research Methods: Integrating Conceptual Frameworks and Project Management. Stillwater, OK: New Forums Printing. ISBN9781581072471.
32. ^ Gauch, Jr., H.G. (2003). Scientific method in exercise. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 2003 ISBN 0-521-81689-0 (page iii)
33. ^ Rocco, T.S., Hatcher, T., & Creswell, J.Due west. (2011). The handbook of scholarly writing and publishing. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons. 2011 ISBN 978-0-470-39335-2
34. ^ "QUESTIONS ABOUT FREEDOM, DEMOCIDE, AND War". www.hawaii.edu.
35. ^ Plato, & Bluck, R. S. (1962). Meno. Cambridge, UK: University Press.
36. ^ Sullivan P (xiii April 2005). "Maurice R. Hilleman dies; created vaccines". The Washington Postal service.
37. ^ Snelson, Chareen L. (March 2016). "Qualitative and Mixed Methods Social Media Research". International Periodical of Qualitative Methods. 15 (i): 160940691562457. doi:10.1177/1609406915624574.
38. ^ Creswell, J.W. (2008). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
39. ^ ^{a b c} Eyler, Amy A., PhD, CHES. (2020). Research Methods for Public Wellness. New York: Springer Publishing Company. ISBN978-0-8261-8206-7. OCLC 1202451096. {{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
40. ^ "Data Drove Methods". uwec.edu.
41. ^ Kara H. (2012). Research and Evaluation for Busy Practitioners: A Time-Saving Guide, p. 102. Bristol: The Policy Press.
42. ^ Kara H (2012). Inquiry and Evaluation for Busy Practitioners: A Time-Saving Guide, p. 114. Bristol: The Policy Press.
43. ^ Creswell, John W. (2014). Research design : qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Chiliad Oaks: Sage. ISBN978-one-4522-2609-5.
44. ^ Liu, Alex (2015). "Structural Equation Modeling and Latent Variable Approaches". Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. pp. 1–15. doi:10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0325. ISBN978-1118900772.
45. ^ Douglas, Heather (2014). "The Moral Terrain of Science". Erkenntnis. 79 (S5): 961–979. doi:10.1007/s10670-013-9538-0. ISSN 0165-0106. S2CID 144445475.
46. ^ ^{a b} Israel, M. K., & Thomson, A. C. (27–29 November 2013). The rising and much-sought demise of the adversarial culture in Australian research ideals. Paper presented at the 2013 Australasian Ethics Network Conference, Perth, Commonwealth of australia.
47. ^ ^{a b} State of israel, 1000. (2016). Research ethics and integrity for social scientists: Beyond regulatory compliance (Second ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
48. ^ Eaton, Sarah Elaine (2020). "Ethical considerations for research conducted with human participants in languages other than English language". British Educational Research Journal. 46 (4): 848–858. doi:10.1002/berj.3623. ISSN 0141-1926. S2CID 216445727.
49. ^ Stahl, B. C., Timmermans, J., & Flick, C. (2017). "Ethics of Emerging Information and Communication Technologies On the implementation of responsible research and innovation". Science and Public Policy, 44(3), 369–381.
50. ^ Iphofen, R. (2016). Ethical decision making in social research: A practical guide. Springer.
51. ^ Wickson, F., Preston, C., Binimelis, R., Herrero, A., Hartley, South., Wynberg, R., & Wynne, B. (2017). "Addressing socio-economic and ethical considerations in biotechnology governance: The potential of a new politics of care". Food ethics, one(2), 193–199.
52. ^ Whitbeck, C. (2011). Ideals in engineering science practice and research. Cambridge University Press.
53. ^ Government of Canada. (n.d.). Panel on Enquiry Ethics: The TCPS2 Tutorial Course on Enquiry Ethics (Core). Retrieved from http://pre.ideals.gc.ca/eng/teaching/tutorial-didacticiel/
54. ^ Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Technology Inquiry Council of Canada, & Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. (2018). Tri-Quango Policy Argument: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans: TCPS2 2018. Retrieved from http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/eng/documents/tcps2-2018-en-interactive-final.pdf
55. ^ Ioannidis, John P. A.; Fanelli, Daniele; Dunne, Debbie Drake; Goodman, Steven N. (2 Oct 2015). "Meta-research: Evaluation and Improvement of Enquiry Methods and Practices". PLOS Biology. 13 (10): –1002264. doi:ten.1371/journal.pbio.1002264. ISSN 1545-7885. PMC4592065. PMID 26431313.
56. ^ Reverby, Susan M. (1 April 2012). "Zachary M. Schrag. Ethical Imperialism: Institutional Review Boards and the Social Sciences, 1965–2009. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 2010. Pp. xii, 245. $45.00". The American Historical Review. 117 (2): 484–485. doi:10.1086/ahr.117.2.484-a. ISSN 0002-8762.
57. ^ Smith, Linda Tuhiwai (2012). Decolonizing Methodologies: Enquiry and Indigenous Peoples (2d ed.). London: Zed Books. ISBN978-1848139503.
58. ^ Stewart, Lisa (2012). "Commentary on Cultural Multifariousness Beyond the Pacific: The Authorisation of Western Theories, Models, Research and Practice in Psychology". Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology. half dozen (1): 27–31. doi:10.1017/prp.2012.one.
59. ^ Canagarajah, A. Suresh (1 Jan 1996). "From Critical Research Practice to Critical Inquiry Reporting". TESOL Quarterly. 30 (ii): 321–331. doi:10.2307/3588146. JSTOR 3588146.
60. ^ ^{a b} Canagarajah, Suresh (Oct 1996). "'Nondiscursive' Requirements in Academic Publishing, Material Resource of Periphery Scholars, and the Politics of Knowledge Product". Written Advice. thirteen (four): 435–472. doi:10.1177/0741088396013004001. S2CID 145250687.
61. ^ ^{a b} Pepinsky, Thomas B. (2019). "The Return of the Single-Country Study". Annual Review of Political Science. 22: 187–203. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-051017-113314.
62. ^ Kukull, W. A.; Ganguli, K. (2012). "Generalizability: The trees, the forest, and the low-hanging fruit". Neurology. 78 (23): 1886–1891. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e318258f812. PMC3369519. PMID 22665145.
63. ^ "Peer Review of Scholarly Journal". www.PeerViewer.com. June 2017.
64. ^ ^{a b c} Christen, Kimberly (2012). "Does Information Actually Want to be Complimentary? Ethnic Cognition Systems and the Question of Openness". International Journal of Communication. 6.
65. ^ ^{a b} "Sunday sets on Western dominance as Eastward Asian Confucian model takes lead". 24 February 2011. Retrieved 29 August 2016.
66. ^ ^{a b c} Minasny, Budiman; Fiantis, Dian; Mulyanto, Budi; Sulaeman, Yiyi; Widyatmanti, Wirastuti (15 August 2020). "Global soil science inquiry collaboration in the 21st century: Fourth dimension to end helicopter inquiry". Geoderma. 373: 114299. Bibcode:2020Geode.373k4299M. doi:x.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114299. ISSN 0016-7061.
67. ^ ^{a b} Dahdouh-Guebas, Farid; Ahimbisibwe, J.; Van Moll, Rita; Koedam, Nico (1 March 2003). "Neo-colonial science past the about industrialised upon the least developed countries in peer-reviewed publishing". Scientometrics. 56 (3): 329–343. doi:10.1023/A:1022374703178. ISSN 1588-2861. S2CID 18463459.
68. ^ "Q&A: Parachute Scientific discipline in Coral Reef Research". The Scientist Magazine® . Retrieved 24 March 2021.
69. ^ ^{a b c} "The Problem With 'Parachute Science'". Scientific discipline Fri . Retrieved 24 March 2021.
70. ^ "Scientists Say It's Time To End 'Parachute Research'". NPR.org . Retrieved 24 March 2021.
71. ^ Health, The Lancet Global (1 June 2018). "Endmost the door on parachutes and parasites". The Lancet Global Health. 6 (6): e593. doi:ten.1016/S2214-109X(18)30239-0. ISSN 2214-109X. PMID 29773111. S2CID 21725769.
72. ^ Smith, James (1 August 2018). "Parasitic and parachute research in global health". The Lancet Global Wellness. 6 (8): e838. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(xviii)30315-2. ISSN 2214-109X. PMID 30012263. S2CID 51630341.
73. ^ "Helicopter Enquiry". TheFreeDictionary.com . Retrieved 24 March 2021.
74. ^ ^{a b} Vos, Asha de. "The Problem of 'Colonial Science'". Scientific American . Retrieved 24 March 2021.
75. ^ "The Traces of Colonialism in Science". Observatory of Educational Innovation . Retrieved 24 March 2021.
76. ^ Stefanoudis, Paris V.; Licuanan, Wilfredo Y.; Morrison, Tiffany H.; Talma, Sheena; Veitayaki, Joeli; Woodall, Lucy C. (22 February 2021). "Turning the tide of parachute science". Current Biological science. 31 (4): R184–R185. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2021.01.029. ISSN 0960-9822. PMID 33621503.
77. ^ "Ведущий научный сотрудник: должностные обязанности". www.aup.ru.
78. ^ Heiner Evanschitzky, Carsten Baumgarth, Raymond Hubbard and J. Scott Armstrong (2006). "Replication Enquiry in Marketing Revisited: A Note on a Agonizing Trend" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 20 June 2010. Retrieved ten Jan 2012. {{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors listing (link)
79. ^ J. Scott Armstrong & Peer Soelberg (1968). "On the Interpretation of Cistron Analysis" (PDF). Psychological Message. lxx (v): 361–364. doi:x.1037/h0026434. S2CID 25687243. Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 June 2010. Retrieved 11 January 2012.
80. ^ J. Scott Armstrong & Robert Fildes (2006). "Monetary Incentives in Post Surveys" (PDF). International Journal of Forecasting. 22 (three): 433–441. doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2006.04.007. S2CID 154398140. Archived from the original (PDF) on 20 June 2010. Retrieved 11 January 2012.
81. ^ "Home | RePORT". report.nih.gov.

Further reading [edit]

• Groh, Arnold (2018). Inquiry Methods in Ethnic Contexts. New York: Springer. ISBN978-3-319-72774-5.
• Cohen, Northward.; Arieli, T. (2011). "Field research in conflict environments: Methodological challenges and snowball sampling". Journal of Peace Research. 48 (iv): 423–436. doi:10.1177/0022343311405698. S2CID 145328311.
• Soeters, Joseph; Shields, Patricia and Rietjens, Sebastiaan. 2014. Handbook of Research Methods in Military Studies New York: Routledge.
• Talja, Sanna and Pamela J. Mckenzie (2007). Editor'south Introduction: Special Issue on Discursive Approaches to Information Seeking in Context, The University of Chicago Press.

External links [edit]

Wikiversity has learning resources about Research

mortonmuty1955.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Research

Share this post